The major addition to this over the Viper
is the four side buttons. I had a minor quibble about the Viper
because of the lack of buttons and the Diamondback
attempts to solve the problem. Each side button are designed like rocker switches so they double as two buttons. While I do like the extra buttons, I was only able to comfortable use the ones positioned by my thumb. I didn’t touch the ones near my pinky at all, so this essentially dropped the seven button scheme to five for me. That’s not bad and I understand Razer’s stance on providing ambidextrous mice for gamers. I did wish Razer would’ve increased the sizes of the side button though as I found them a little too small or perhaps separated them so they were easier to differentiate.
16 data pipes in the karna optical engine gives this mouse ample bandwidth to send information to the computer. Razer states that traditional mice feature 8 data pipes so that quick movements can be lost. Their 16 pipe design helps alleviate this by being able to send more information at once.
I received a few emails complaining about the Viper
’s tendency to dim the optical light when not in use for a very short period of time. The Diamondback
’s design now features and always on optical light so it will never dim or sleep no matter how long you are away from it. This should please users who found a slight delay in the Viper
when coming out from sleep. I never got that impression using the Viper
but this is a moot point now with the Diamondback
The drivers for the Diamondback
have a few more options, mainly allowing you to program the four side buttons. As usual, you can modify your sensitivity on the fly and this time the default is holding down the thumb button and rotating the wheel. In the driver window, you can further tune the X and Y-axis sensitivity along with the acceleration. And each button is programmable so you can set them to a key press if the game doesn’t support them natively through the driver window. I’ve always like Razer’s drivers and they certainly allow for a good amount of customization through their suite.
For testing purposes, I put it through the paces of a few first person shooters with an emphasis on CounterStrike: Source
and a few RTS games. I tend to use some different settings dependent on the game. I’ll usually go higher in sensitivity for twitch games such as Quake 3
and lower in tactical games like CounterStrike: Source
That’s where the on the fly sensitivity comes into play as I can adjust this from game to game without going into the driver window. Since I’ve been using the Viper
, I didn’t have the learning curve needed to get used to the high sensitivity of the Diamondback
. So as far as performance goes, I couldn’t tell the difference between the two. And in my previous review of the Viper
I stated how great it was to use and hard for me to go back to any other mice. The same can be said for the Diamondback
The extra two usable thumb buttons for me brought me up to speed with the other mice that I’m used to and I programmed the commands I used to them on the Diamondback
. The small size of the thumb buttons did take a little bit to get used to though and as stated earlier, I would’ve liked to have them enlarged and/or separated.
One thing about Razer I like is they design for gamers in mind and try to put in features that gamers want. The Razer Diamondback
tries to improve on the great Viper
and does so in some aspects. I would’ve liked a better design on the thumb buttons though and it’s still a little small. Other than that, I enjoyed using the Diamondback
and I’ve found the features such as on the fly sensitivity and unique optical engine really made my gaming experience enjoyable. I think this mouse would really only benefit heavy FPS gamers. For you LAN folks, it even comes with a nice carrying case. It’s not for everyone but the Razer Diamondback
is a good gaming mouse if you can handle the high sensitivity.
It's an accurate mouse and fixes some minor issues with the Viper. The design with the new buttons has its ups and downs but the mouse's sensitivity and accuracy is second to none.
Page 2 of 2