Fact or Fiction 1/12/2005


posted 1/13/2005 by The GN Staff
other articles by The GN Staff
One Page Platforms:
Welcome to our latest edition of Fact or Faction. Today we have five more topics that Charlie Sinhanseni, Charles Husemann, and John Yan discuss. And let's get started with...

1) EA’s 5 year exclusive rights to the NFL and NFLPA license is a good thing.

Charlie Sinhaseni: Fiction. You know how people complain about Microsoft and its anti-trust tactics? Well forget all about that, because what EA does is a hell of a lot worse. At least Microsoft has the decency to pay its employees for all of their hard work. Screwing over its employees wasn’t enough, now it’s decided to screw over the consumer as well. A market rife with alternatives is a healthy one as it allows for competition and selection. Just look at this year as an example; SEGA was able to rise up from the ashes and deliver an excellent football game that absolutely killed EA’s franchise in every respect. How does EA handle this? Does it go back to the drawing board and improve upon the weaker aspects of the game? Nope, it simply eliminates its competition so that it can beat consumers over the head with the same game, year after year.

I could accept this if EA had produced a high quality football game year after year but it doesn’t. It shoves the same game down player’s throats, every single year. EA also has exclusivity deals with NASCAR but the NASCAR Thunder franchise is simply at the top of its sport. The Madden franchise isn’t and the ESPN franchise is just the far superior title, at the smaller price point as well. Remember, EA only lowered the price point of Madden to $39.99 after SEGA’s $19.99 price point took a huge chunk out of its profits. That brings up another point, with no competition, EA is free to charge the consumer whatever it pleases. Let’s just say that it won’t be thinking about charging $19.99 for next year’s game.

Shame on EA and shame on the NFL. You both just put dollar signs before the consumer. I can tell you right now that there’s one game I won’t be playing next year and that game is Madden 2006. Forget them, I hope that Visual Concepts releases a football game without the NFL license anyway. People will still buy it and some of the true fans will come through and offer places to download the NFL rosters, just like in the old Front Page Football days. This way all of the profits will go to the right place, to the hardworking programming team and not to the greedy money hungry whores who run the NFL.

On that same note, it should be pointed out that Midway is now making Blitz: Playmakers, a football game that features everything that the NFL likes to pretend doesn’t exist in its league. According to IGN, it’s a collaboration between the guys at Midway and a head writer from the TV show that ran on ESPN. It gained high ratings and critical acclaim but was canned when NFL started pressuring ESPN by threatening to pull its programming from the network. Now that I think about, maybe this whole exclusive deal isn’t such a bad thing. It’ll at least allow developers to make a football game that’s more realistic and devoid of all of the politicking and problems brought forth by the NFL and EA.

Charles Husemann: Fiction. The only real winner in this deal is the NFL since they managed toe extract a huge sum of cash from EA to pay for the rights. This means that EA will have to find a way to cover the added cost of the license which means more advertising in the games and less innovation in the title.

John Yan: Fiction. When I read this news, my first thought was to the great effort that Sega produced this year and how we're probably not going to be treated to a quality football game for next year with real NFL players and teams. Yes, I can't see EA signing this exclusive agreement and churning out a Madden game that wasn't just like the year before only with a few tweaks that don't amount to much. I've always said competition is great and lets you work harder at producing a better product. EA has essentially eliminated the competition in NFL football games and I, for one, don't like it one bit. I haven't read any of it all positive responses from the community about this move so it'll be interesting to see how it's going to be for the next five years. I'm not getting my hopes up either way. I do hope Sega moves into the college football world and takes their great engine to that scene. Let's just hope EA isn't going to try and buy an exclusive deal with the NCAA on this one.

2) Half-Life 2 is the game of the year.

Charlie Sinhaseni: Fact. If you’ve played the game you know why this is quite possibly one of the greatest games ever made. The gravity gun is really enough to make this game special, but its intense battles, monolith boss battles and spectacular visuals really propel it over the competition. I’ve probably played every single first person shooter made after 1994 and I can’t think of one that has made a bigger impact on me than Half-Life 2. It’s brilliant, simply brilliant.

Charles Husemann: Fact. Half-Life 2 was the first game I’ve played in years that I missed when I finished it. I know I’m the resident HL2 fan boy but I’ve actually already started playing it again to find everything I missed the first time through which is something I haven’t done with a game since Eternal Darkness came out.

John Yan: Fact There were delays, lies, theft, and other various factors that worked against Valve. In the end, they delivered an awesome single player experience. The story wasn't that deep but the action and pacing was perfect. It's like playing the best parts of several movies and the mixture of genre types provided a very diverse experience. There wasn't a game this year where I rushed down to the computer room immedietly after it was released and I didn't emerge from there for many hours afterwards. Half-Life 2 provided Valve with two hits in their pocket and while it was a year late, it's well worth the wait. The engine just makes MOD makers salivate and I can't wait to see what the community will do with it.
Page 1 of 2